Ces Urol 1999, 3(3):30-34

Surgery of bladder neck in children and adolescents

K. Novák1, R. Kočvara1,3, Z. Dítě1,3, J. Dvořáček1,2, J. Kříž1
1 Urologická klinika VFN a 1. LF UK, Praha,
2 Katedra urologie IPVZ, Praha
3 Subkatedra dětské urologie IPVZ, Praha

Bladder neck surgery represents an important part of the incontinence treatment in children and adolescents. Purpose of the retrospective study was to evaluate 30 patients after the bladder neck repair. They underwent operation between 1986 and 1998 (13 boys and 17 girls). The bladder neck was repaired in 27 patients, closed in 3. Bladder augmentation was indicated in 15 patients, ureterovesicostomy in 12 with vesi-coureteral reflux. Follow-up of 27 patients was performed (15 with augmentation and 12 without augmentation).
Six (40 %) children in the group with augmentation are continent, 6 (40 %) significantly improved and 3 (20 %) remain incontinent. Five (42 %) patients in the non-augmented group are continent and 7 (58 %) are significantly improved. All patients in augmented group perform clean intermittent catheterization. No deterioration of renal function was encountered. Vesicoureteral reflux persists in 5 from 12 patients after ureterovesicostomy.
We improved incontinence by surgical procedures in 90 % children and adolescents with neurogenic bladder or extrophy/epispadias complex.

Keywords: Urinary incontinence in children and adolescents, Bladder neck surgery, Neurogenic bladder, Exstrophy/epispadias complex

Published: June 1, 1999 


References

  1. Young, H. H.: An operation for the cure of incontinence associated with epispadias. J. Urol., 7, 1922, s.1-32. Go to original source...
  2. Dess, J. E.: Congenital epispadias and incontinence. J. Urol., 62, 1949, s.513-522. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Leadbetter, G. W.: Surgical correction of total urinary incontinence. J. Urol., 91, 1964, s.261-266. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Franco, I., Kolligan, M., Reda, E. F., Lewitt, S. B.: The importance of catheter size in the achievement of urinary continence in patients undergoing a Young-DeesLeadbetter procedure. J. Urol., 152, 1994, s.710-712. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Jones, J. A., Mitchell, M. E., Rink, R. C.: Improved results using a modification of the Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck repair. Br. J. Urol., 71, 1993, s.555-561. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Kropp, K. A., Angwafo, F. F.: Urethral lenghtening and reimplantation for neurogenic incontinence in children. J. Urol., 135, 1986, s.533-536. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Mouriquand, P. D. E., Sheard, R., Philllips, N., White, J., Sharma, S., Vandenberg, C.: The Kropp-onlay procedure (Pippi Sale procedure): a simplification of the technique of urethral lenghtening. Preliminary results in eight patients. Br. J. Urol., 75, 1995, s.656-662. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Stefan, H.: Vrozená epispadie s inkontinencí moče: dlouhodobé výsledky rekonstrukční léčby. Rozhl. Chir., 72, 1993, s.319-323.
  9. Gearhart, J. P., Williams, K. A., Jeffs, R. D.: Intraoperative urethral pressure profilometry as an adjunct to bladder neck reconstruction. J. Urol., 136, 1986, s.1055-1056. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Elder, J. S.: Periurethral and puboprostatic sling repair for incontinence in patients with myelodysplasia. J. Urol., 144, 1990, s.434-437. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Dvořáček, J., Kočvara, R., Dítě, Z.: Augmentace močového měchýře u dětí a dospívajících s neurogenním měchýřem. In: Jarolím, L.: Pokroky v urologii. Sborník prací mezinárodního urologického sympozia u příležitosti 20. výročí Urologické kliniky 1. lékařské fakulty University Karlovy a Všeobecné fakultní nemocnice v Praze, 1996, s.24-29.
  12. Gearhart, J. P., Canning, D. A., Peppas, D. S., Jeffs, R. D.: Techniques to create continence in the failed bladder exstrophy closure patient. J. Urol., 150, 1993, s.441-443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Stein, R., Fisch, M., Stockle, M., Hohenfellner, R.: Urinary diversion in bladder exstrophy and incontinent epispadias: 25 years of experience. J. Urol., 154, 1995, s.1177-1181. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Gearhart, J. P., Canning, D. A., Jeffs, R. D.: Failed bladder neck reconstruction: options for management. J. Urol., 146, 1991, s.1082-1084. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Dvořáček, J., Kočvara, R.: Appendix vermiformis a jeho využití v urologii. Rozhl. Chir., 4, 1995, s.176-179.
  16. Sumfest, J. M., Burns, M. W., Mitchell, M. E.: The Mitrofanoff principle in urinary reconstruction. J. Urol., 150, 1993, s.1875-1878. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Hasan, S. T., Marshall, C., Neal, D. E.: Continent urinary diversion using the Mitrofanoff principle. Br. J. Urol., 74, 1994, s.454-459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Duckett, J.W., Lotfi, A.H.: Appendicovesicostomy (and variations) in bladder reconstruction. J. Urol., 149, 1993, s.567-569. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Kaefer, M., Retik, A. B.: The Mitrofanoff principle in continent urinary reconstruction. In: Urologic Clinics of North America, 24, 1997, s.795-811. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Parres, J. A., Kropp, K. A.: Urodynamic evaluation of the continence mechanism following urethral lenghtening - reimplantation and enterocystoplasty. J. Urol., 146, s.535-538. Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit