Ces Urol 2004, 8(3):42-45 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2004020

ESWL in treatment of urolithiasis. A two-year experience with the Piesolith 3000 litotriptor

J. Fillo, J. Mardiak, M. Maµa, ©. Szeiff, L. Červenakov, M. Kopečný
urologické oddelenie FN Bratislava, primár MUDr. Juraj Fillo, CSc.

The study aims at evaluation of results obtained by the ESWL treatment of urolithiasis with Piesolith 3000. It concentrates on the efficacy (stone free after treatment), safety and economy of the treatment. Authors carried out 1 444 ESWL operations in 1 118 patients during a period of two years. In all cases the Piesolith 3000 was used. 72.4 % patients remained stone free after a 3-month period. Another ESWL was needed in 28.7 % of patients. The operations proved to be safe, noiseless and of a sufficient pulverisation effectiveness. Concurrantly the cystin stones were pulverized. There was a very low incidence of complication. Only in 3 patients, i.e. 0.26 %, haematoma occured. All of these were treated conservatively with success. The two-year experience with lithotriptor Piesolith 3000 raised high expectations. The online ultrasound focalisation of kidney calculi proved to be very fast and precise. Due to the small focus size, the surrounding tissue is affected less. Because of a large aperture in the piesolith head, the operations are significantly less painful if compared to operations with other lithotriptors. Besides, the Litohtriptor 3000 is noiseless and thus much better accepted by the patients.

Keywords: urolithiasis, ESWL, efficacy, soreness, economy

Published: June 1, 2004 


References

  1. Chaussy CG, Schmidt E, Jocham D et al. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 1982; 127: 417-420. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Zanetti G, Seveso M, Montanari E et al. Renal stone fragments following shock wave litotrypsy. J Urol 1997; 158: 352-355. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Lingeman JE, Newmann E, Mertz JHD et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience. J Urol 1986;135: 1134-1137. In: EAU Guidelines Urolithiasis 2003: 26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Politis G, Griffith DP. ESWL: Stone free efficacy based upon stone size and location. World J Urol 1987; 5: 225-228. In EAU Guidelines Urolithiasis 2003: 26. Go to original source...
  5. Mobley TB, Myers DA, Grine WB et al. Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: Treatment resuslts with 19962 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 1993; 149: 1419-1424. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Netto NR, Claro JFA, Lemos GC et al. Renal calculi in lower pole calyces: What is the best method of treatment? J Urol 1991; 146: 721-723. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Lingeman JE. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 24: 185-211. In: Walsh PC et al (eds). Campbell ́s Urology. New York: Saunders 2002: 3404. Go to original source...
  8. Cass AS. Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: Treatment resulst with 13864 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 1995;153: 588-592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Lingeman JE. Urolithiasis. Shock wave lithotripsy uptade. 99th AUA Annual meeting. May 8-13, 2004 San Francisco.
  10. Lingeman JE. Urolithiasis. 98th AUA Annual meeting. April 28, 2003 Chicago.
  11. Thomas R, Cass AS. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 1993; 150: 30-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Tan EC, Tun KH, Foo KT. Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy by Dornier HM3, EDAP LT 01 and Sonolith 2000 devices. J Urol 1991; 146: 294-297. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Talati J, Sutton RAL, Moazam F, Ahmed M. The management of lithiasis. Great Britain: Kluwer Academic 1997: 85-88. Go to original source...
  14. Marberger M, Turk C, Steinkogler I. Painless piezoelectric extracorporeal lithotripsy. J Urol 1988; 139: 695-699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, ľe informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit