Ces Urol X:X | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2025016

Positive surgical margins in renal malignancies after nephron-sparing surgery – results of a single-centre retrospective analysis

Rostyslav Luzan, Petr Klézl, Jindřích Šonský, Jakub Hanych, Robert Grill
Urologická klinika 3. LF UK a FN Královské Vinohrady, Praha

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of positive surgical margins (PSM) in nephron-sparing surgeries on the kidneys, postoperative follow-up, and complications in patients at our institution with global trends.

Material and methods: The analysis was conducted on a set of procedures performed at the Urology clinic of University Hospital Královské Vinohrady from 2011 to 2021.

Results: During the analyzed period, a total of 611 nephron-sparing surgeries were performed at our clinic. Of these, 117 patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and 494 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN). Among the patients who underwent OPN, malignant histology was confirmed in 336 cases, with PSM observed in 21 patients (6.25%). In the LPN group, malignant histology was confirmed in 81 cases, with PSM found in 6 patients (7.4%). Another subgroup consisted of patients with uncertain surgical margins. Overall, in the cohort of patients who underwent OPN, this type of surgical margin was observed in 16 cases (4.7%), while in the LPN group, it was observed in 6 cases (7.4%). Local recurrence occurred in 5 cases and metastasis in 4 cases in the OPN group. In patients who underwent LPN with confirmed PSM, no cases of recurrence or metastasis were observed.

Conclusion: This research confirms alignment with the overall trend in several key aspects. The incidence of positive surgical margins in nephron-sparing surgeries on the kidneys corresponds to the values reported in the literature and confirms that positive surgical margins rarely lead to disease relapse.

Keywords: positive surgical margins – nephron-sparing surgery – kidneys – postoperative follow-up – outcomes

Received: December 8, 2024; Revised: June 3, 2025; Accepted: June 13, 2025; Prepublished online: August 21, 2025 


References

  1. LiteraturaCapitanio U, Bansalah K, Axel B et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019; 75(1): 74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.036. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Li QN, Guan HW, Zhang QP et al. Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less. Eur Urol 2003; 44(4): 448-451. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00310-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Snarskis C, Calaway AC, Wang L et al. Standardized reporting of microscopic renal tumor margins: introduction of the renal tumor capsule invasion scoring system. J Urol 2017; 197(1): 23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.086. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Minervini A, di Cristofano C, Lapini A et al. Histopathologic analysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margin status after tumor enucle- ation for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2009; 55(6): 1410-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.038. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bertolo R, Pecoraro A, Carbonara U et al. Resection techniques during robotic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol Open Sci 2023; 52: 7-21. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N et al. Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treat- ed by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2010; 57(3): 466-471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.048. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Gill IS, Martin SF, Desai MM et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 2003; 170(1): 64-68. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000072272.02322.ff. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Gill IS, Kavousii LR, Lane BR et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007; 178(1): 41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Zhang L, Wu B, Zha Z et al. The correlation of clinicopathological features with the status of surgical margins in renal cell cancer patients following nephron-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 648. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00648. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Carvalho JA, Nunes P, Tavares-da-Silva E et al. Impact of positive surgical margins after partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol Open Sci 2020; 21: 41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Tabayoyong W, Abousally R, Kiechle JE et al. Variation in surgical margin status by surgical approach among patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. J Urol 2015; 194(6): 1548-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.076. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Tellini R, Antonelli A, Tardanico R et al. Positive surgical margins predict progression-free survival after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: results from a single center cohort of 459 cases with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17(1): e26-e31. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.08.004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182(3): 844-853. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit