Ces Urol 2006, 10(3):24-29 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2006019

Metrological properties of profilometry catheters in an experiment

F. Zá»ura
Urologická klinika FN a LF UP v Olomouci

Using an experimental phantom of the urethra made from the urethra of the bull, compression pressures acting from one side as well as circular pressure were simulated. Both the measurement with the perfusion method using catheters with one or more openings and the measurement with catheters with a measuring chamber have been shown to provide good reproducibility, however, the signal is strongly dependent on the position of the catheter in the urethra. The same applies to the catheter with an incorporated sensor (MikroTip). Overall information on the pressure from the whole circumference of the urethra was obtained only from an air-charged balloon catheter (T-DOC). This device also yielded the best sensitivity rates as well as the lowest diffusion rates.

Keywords: Urethral pressure profile, UPP, profilometry

Published: June 1, 2006 


References

  1. Zatura F, Rosenberg J. Possibilities of experimental verification of the validity of urethral pressure profilometry. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2006,(2): 345-351. 345. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Gilmour RF, James DF, Toguri AG, Churchill BM. Analysys of the Urethral pressure profile using a mechanical Model. Jurol 18, 1, (1980) 54-58.
  3. Lose G, Griffiths D, Hosker D, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Perucchini D, Schäfer W, Thind P, Versi E. Standardisation of Urethral Pressure Meassurement: Report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2002;(3): 258-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck P. Report on Good Urodynamic Practice. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21(3): 261-274. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Brown M, Wickham JEA. The urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol 1969; 41: 211. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Harrison NW, Constable AR. Urehral Pressure Meassurement: a modified Technique. BJU 42 (1970), 229-233. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. The measurement and interpretation of urethral pressures obtained by the method of Brown and Wickham. Br J Urol 1978; 150: 33-38.
  8. Abrams P, Feneley R,Torrens. Urethral Pressure meassurements. In Urodynamics, 1983, s. 48-61. Go to original source...
  9. Griffiths D. The pressure within a collapsed tube, with special reference to urethral pressure. Phys Med Biol 1985; 30: 951-963. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Gleason DM, Botacini MR, Reilly RJ. Comparsion of cystometrogram and urethral profiles with gas and water media. Urology (1977) 9: 155-160. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Shawer M, Brown M, Sutherst JR. Comparative examination of female urethral pressure profiles measured by CO2 and H2 O infusion techniques. Br J Urol 1983; 55: 326-331. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Anderson RS, Shepherd AM, Feneley RCL. Microtransducer urethral profile methodology: variations caused by transducer orientation. J. Urol. 130., 727-728, 1983. Go to original source...
  13. Meyer S, DeGrandi P, Schmidt N et al. The effect of catheter diameter on the urethral cough pressure profile of continent and incontinent patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1992; 3: 2-7. Go to original source...
  14. Schafer W. Directional differences in urethral pressure recordings: Contributions from the stiffness and weight of the recording catheter. Neurourol Urodyn 1986; 5: 119-120. Go to original source...
  15. Plevnik S, Janez J, Vrtacnik P, Brown M Directional differences in urethral pressure recordings: contributions from the stiffness and weight of the recording catheter. Neurourol Urodyn 4 (1985) 117-128. Go to original source...
  16. Wang AC, Chen MC. A comparison of urethral pressure profilometry using microtip and double-lumen perfusion catheters in women with genuine stress incontinence. Int J ObsGyn 109 3 (2002) 322. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Hilton P, Stanton SL. Urethral pressure meassurement by microtransducer: results in symptom free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 919-933. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Elser DM, London W, Fantl JA, et al. A comparsion of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic catethers. Int Urogynecol J Pelvis Floor Dysfunct 1999; 10: 371-374. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Pollak JT, Neimark M, Jason C, Connor T. Davila GW. Air-charged and microtransducer urodynamic catheters in the evaluation of urethral function. Int Urogynecol J 2004) 15: 124-128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Zá»ura F, Vrtal R, Fiala R, Rosenberg J, Křen J. Validita profilometrie a nové moľnosti měření. Česká urologie 2003; 1: 42-45.





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, ľe informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit