Ces Urol 2022, 26(3):186-192 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2022018

Evaluation of pain of transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia

Jiří Stejskal, Vanda Adamcová, Roman Zachoval
Urologická klinika 3. lékařské fakulty a Fakultní Thomayerovy nemocnice v Praze

Stejskal J, Adamcová V, Zachoval R. Evaluation of pain of transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia.

Aim: The goal of the analysis is to evaluate patient reported pain during transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBxP) under local anaesthesia (LA).

Methods: We evaluated 55 patients who had a TPBxP under LA comprising 26 first and 29 repeated biopsies. On average 15 cores were obtained in each patient (12-18). The local anaesthesia was administered using 50cc of mesocaine applied to the perineal skin and prostate apex. No intravenous or oral analgesics were used. The patients reported the painfulness of both local anaesthesia and prostate biopsy using a scale of 1 (no pain) to 10 (highest pain imaginable). The data were then correlated with the patients' age, prostate size, PSA level and the number of taken biopsy cores.

Results: The mean patient age was 66.85 years (54-78), the mean PSA was 10.11ng/ml (0.66 - 53.6), and the average prostate size was 46cc (17-126). The mean patient reported pain was 2,04 (1-7, median 2) for the application of the LA and 4.05 (1-7, median 4) for the biopsy. There was a positive correlation between the application of LA and the biopsy itself. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between patient age and the reported painfulness of TPBxP.

Conclusion: TPBxP is reasonably well tolerated by patients. The biopsy itself is more painful than the application of LA. Older patients tend to tolerate the procedure better. The PSA level, prostate size and the number of biopsy cores have no effect on the patient reported pain.

Keywords: Transperineal prostate biopsy, local anaesthesia, pain, prostate cancer.

Received: May 11, 2022; Revised: June 16, 2022; Accepted: June 30, 2022; Prepublished online: June 29, 2022; Published: September 21, 2022 


References

  1. Grummet JP, Weerakoon M, Huang S, et al. Sepsis and 'superbugs': should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? BJU Int. 2014; 114(3): 384-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Eldred‑Evans D, Kasivisvanathan V, Khan F, et al. The Use of Transperineal Sector Biopsy as A First‑Line Biopsy Strategy: A Multi‑Institutional Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications. Urol J. 2016 10; 13(5): 2849-55.
  3. Berry B, Parry MG, Sujenthiran A, et al. Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population‑based study. BJU Int. 2020; 126(1): 97-103. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019; 13: 17(1):31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Pradere B, Veeratterapillay R, Dimitropoulos K, et al. Nonantibiotic Strategies for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis. J Urol. 2021; 205(3): 653-63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Pilatz A, Veeratterapillay R, Köves B, et al. Update on Strategies to Reduce Infectious Complications After Prostate Biopsy. Eur Urol Focus. 2019; 5(1): 20-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, et al. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Local Anesthesia: Experience with 1,287 Patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability. J Urol. 2019; 201(6): 1121-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Tu X, Liu Z, Chang T, et al. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging‑Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019; 17(5): e860-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Rai BP, Mayerhofer C, Somani BK, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion‑guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion‑guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy - A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021; 4(6): 904-913. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Xue J, Qin Z, Cai H, et al. Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta‑analysis and trial sequential analysis. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(14): 23322-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, et al. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Asian J Androl. 2012; 14(2): 310-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Guo LH, Wu R, Xu HX, et al. Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. 2015; 5(1): 16089. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Marra G, Marquis A, Tappero S, et al. Transperineal Free‑hand mpMRI Fusion‑targeted Biopsies Under Local Anesthesia: Technique and Feasibility From a Single‑center Prospective Study. Urology. 2020; 140: 122-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Meyer AR, Mamawala M, Winoker JS, et al. Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Improves the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer among Men on Active Surveillance. J Urol. 2020; 101097JU0000000000001523.
  15. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU‑EANM‑ESTRO‑ESUR‑SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021; 79(2): 243-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Bass EJ, Donaldson IA, Freeman A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted transperineal prostate biopsy: a local anaesthetic approach. Prostate Cancer Prostatic, DiS. 2017; 20(3): 311-317. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Stejskal J, Hanáček V, Adamcová V, Zachoval R. Transperineální biopsie v diagnostice karcinomu prostaty. Ces Urol. 2021; 25(2): 94-105.
  18. Ryšánková K, Hanzlíková P, Vrtková A, Albínová T, Jendřejek M, Krhut J. Transperineálně prováděné fúzní US/MRI navigované biopsie prostaty. Ces Urol. 2021; 25(1): 27-34. Go to original source...
  19. Iremashvili VV, Chepurov AK, Kobaladze KM, Gamidov SI. Periprostatic Local Anesthesia With Pudendal Block for Transperineal Ultrasound‑guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Trial. Urology. 2010; 75(5): 1023-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ashley RA, Inman BA, Routh JC, et al. Preventing pain during office biopsy of the prostate: A single center, prospective, double‑blind, 3-arm, parallel group, randomized clinical trial. Cancer. 2007; 110(8): 1708-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Addla SK, Adeyoju AB, Wemyss‑Holden GD, Neilson D. Local anaesthetic for transrectal ultrasound‑guided prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo‑controlled study. Eur Urol. 2003; 43(5): 441-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Lopez JF, Campbell A, Omer A, et al. Local Anaesthetic Transperineal Prostate (LATP) biopsy using a probe‑mounted transperineal access system: A multi‑centre prospective outcome analysis. BJU Int. 2021; 128(3): 311-318. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Catananti C, Gambassi G. Pain assessment in the elderly. Surg Oncol. 2010; 19(3): 140-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit