ČESKÁ UROLOGIE / CZECH UROLOGY – 3 / 2019

200 PŘEHLEDOVÝ ČLÁNEK Ces Urol 2019; 23(3): 194–202 8. Nordstrom T, Akre O, Aly M, et al. Prostate‑specific antigen (PSA) density in the diagnostic algorithm of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic, DiS. 2018; 21(1): 57–63. 9. Bhat NR, Vetter JM, Andriole GL, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging‑Defined Prostate‑Specific Anti‑ gen Density Significantly Improves the Risk Prediction for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Biopsy. Urology 2018; 18: 1324–1328. 10. Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Slawin KM, et al. Use of the percentage of free prostate‑specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: A prospective multicenter clinical trial. JAMA 1998; 279: 1542–1547. 11. Vickers AJ, Savage C, O’Brien MF, et al. Systematic review of pretreatment prostate specific antigen velocity and doubling time as predictors for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 398–403. 12. Lukeš M, Záleský M, Zachoval R, Urban M, Heráček J. Prostatický specifický antigen a karcinom prostaty. Klinická onkologie 2001; 14(4): 114–118. 13. Klečka J, Běhounek P, Hora M. Současné postavení PSA v diagnostice karcinomu prostaty. Urolog. praxi 2008; 9(4): 187–189. 14. Le BV, Griffi n CR, Loeb S, et al. [-2] Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study. J Urol. 2010; 183: 1355–1359. 15. Mikolajczyk SD, Millar LS, Wang TJ, et al. A precursor formof prostate‑specific antigen is more highly ele‑ vated in prostate cancer compared with benign transition zone prostate tissue. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 756–759. 16. Mikolajczyk SD, Rittenhouse HG. Pro PSA: a more cancer specific form of prostate specific antigen for the early detection of prostate cancer. Keio J Med. 2003; 52, 86–91. 17. Jansen FH, van Schaik RH, Kurstjens J. Prostate‑specific antigen (PSA) isoformp2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection. Eur Urol. 2010; 57: 921–927. 18. Guazzoni G, Nava L, Lazzeri M, et al. Prostate‑specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA significantly im‑ proves the prediction of prostate cancer at initial extended prostate biopsies in patients with total PSA between 2.0 and 10 ng/ml: results of a prospective study in a clinical setting. Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 214–222. 19. Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Sanda MG, et al. A multicenter study of [-2]pro‑prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range. J Urol. 2011; 185(5): 1650-1655. 20. Lazzeri M, Haese A, de la Taille A, et al. Serum isoform [-2] proPSA derivatives signifi cantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2–10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol 2013; 63(6): 986–994. 21. Král M, Hradil D, Grepl M, et al. Prostate health index (PHI) u pacientů s karcinomem prostaty a s BPH. Česká urologie 2011; 15(Suppl 2): 16–68. 22. Klečka J, Hora M, Topolčan O, et al. Je proPSA více specifický marker pro detekci karcinomu prostaty. Ces Urol 2011; 15(Suppl 2): 16–68. 23. Fuchsová R, Topolčan O, Vrzalova J, et al. Přínos stanovení [-2]proPSA v diferenciální diagnostice karcinomu prostaty. Ces Urol 18(1): 21–25. 24. Čapoun O, Sobotka R, Soukup V, et al. Prostate health index (PHI) v primární diagnostice karcinomu prostaty. Ces Urol 2014; 18(Suppl 1): 21–109. 25. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Aus G, et al. A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: Data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Goteborg, Sweden. BMC Med. 2008; 6: 19–24. 26. Stattin P, Vickers AJ, Sjoberg DD, et al. Improving the Specificity of Screening for Lethal Prostate Cancer Using Prostate‑specific Antigen and a Panel of Kallikrein Markers: A Nested Case‑Control Study. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(2): 207–213.