ČESKÁ UROLOGIE / CZECH UROLOGY – 4 / 2019

332 ORIGINÁLNÍ PRÁCE Ces Urol 2019; 23(4): 325–332 LITERATURA 1. Fiala V, Sobotka R, Vaľová Z, et al. Zkušenosti s použitím indexu zdraví prostaty v klinické praxi. Ces Urol 2017; 21(4): 284–288. 2. Ryšánková K, Bartoš V, Krhut J, et al. (-2)proPSA a Index zdravé prostaty (PHI) v predikci výskytu karci‑ nomu prostaty v transrektálních biopsiích. Ces Urol 2018; 22(1): 40–47. 3. Hansen NL, Barrett T, Koo B, et al. The influence of prostate‑specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7–10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting. BJU Int. 2017; 119(5): 724–730. 4. Distler FA, Radtke JP, Bonekamp D, et al. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI‑RADSTM for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction. J Urol. 2017; 198(3): 575–582. 5. Zaleský M, Stejskal J, Adamcová V, et al. Možnosti využití MRI a PSA denzity v indikaci biopsie prostaty. Ces Urol [Internet]. 2019; Dostupné z: https://czechurol.cz/artkey/cur-000000-0204.php. 6. Murciano‑Goroff YR, Wolfsberger LD, Parekh A, et al. Variability inMRI vs. ultrasoundmeasures of prostate volume and its impact on treatment recommendations for favorable‑risk prostate cancer patients: a case series. Radiat Oncol Lond Engl [Internet]. 9. září 2014 [citován 18. březen 2019]; 9. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261899/. 7. Watanabe H, Igari D, Tanahashi Y, Harada K, Saitoh M. Transrectal ultrasonotomography of the prostate. J Urol. 1975; 114(5): 734–739. 8. Eri LM, Thomassen H, Brennhovd B, Håheim LL. Accuracy and repeatability of prostate volume mea‑ surements by transrectal ultrasound. Prostate Cancer Prostatic, DiS. 2002; 5(4): 273. 9. Azulay D‑OD, Murphy P, Graham J. The accuracy of prostate volume measurement from ultrasound images: A quasi‑Monte Carlo simulation study using magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2013; 37(7): 628–635. 10. Chung JWNCHF, Vries SH de, Raaijmakers R, Postma R, Bosch JLHR, Mastrigt R van. Prostate Volume Ultrasonography: The Influence of Transabdominal versus Transrectal Approach, Device Type and Operator. Eur Urol. 2004; 46(3): 352–356. 11. Bienz M, Hueber P‑A, Al‑Hathal N, et al. Accuracy of Transrectal Ultrasonography to Evaluate Pathologic Prostate Weight: Correlation With Various Prostate Size Groups. Urology 2014; 84(1): 169–174. 12. Nunez‑Nateras R, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of uro‑ logists and radiologists. Can J Urol 2010; 17(1): 4985–4988. 13. Hricak H, Jeffrey RB, Dooms GC, Tanagho EA. Evaluation of prostate size: A comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Urol Radiol 1988; 9(1): 1. 14. Chernyak V, Flusberg M, Kurteva T, Ghavamian R, Rozenblit AM. Accuracy of prostate measurements on MRI with and without an endorectal coil. Clin Imaging. 2015; 39(1): 85–88. 15. TerrisMK, Stamey TA. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. J Urol 1991; 145(5): 984–987. 16. Lee JS, Chung BH. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Int. 2007; 78(4): 323–327. 17. Weiss BE, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB, Guzzo TJ. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance? Urol Oncol 2013; 31(8): 1436–1440. 18. Christie DRH, Sharpley CF. How Accurately Can Prostate Gland Imaging Measure the Prostate Gland Volume? Results of a Systematic Review. Prostate Cancer 20903111; 2019: 1–12. 19. Osman M, Shebel H, Sankineni S, et al. Whole Prostate Volume and Shape Changes with the Use of an Inflatable and Flexible Endorectal Coil. Radiol Res Pract 2014: 1–6. 20. PatersonNR, Lavallée LT, Nguyen LN, et al. Prostate volume estimations usingmagnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasoundcompared to radical prostatectomy specimens. CanUrol Assoc J. 2016; 10(7–8): 264–268.