Ces Urol 2014, 18(1):21-25 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2014003

Benefit of determining [-2]proPSA levels in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer

Radka Fuchsová1, Ondřej Topolčan1, Jindra Vrzalova1, Milan Hora2, Olga Dolejšová2, Jiří Klečka3, Petr Kasík1
1 Laboratoř imunodiagnostiky a Centrální izotopová laboratoř LF, Plzeň
2 Urologická klinika FN a LF UK, Plzeň
3 Soukromá urologická praxe, Plzeň

Aim:
The goal of this study was to examine if determining [-2]proPSA levels and calculating the Prostate Health Index (PHI) could improve overall sensitivity and specificity of this marker in the diagnosis of prostate cancer compared to standard markers (PSA and %freePSA), and propose an optimal PHI cut-off.

Methods:
A group of 76 patients with suspected prostate cancer, who were scheduled to undergo prostate biopsies, was tested to determine the total PSA, freePSA and [-2]proPSA levels, calculated %freePSA and Prostate Health Index (PHI). Biomarkers were determined using chemiluminescent technology on a Dxl 800 (Beckman Coulter, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.2.

Results:
We found a statistically significant improvement in the area under the ROC (AUC) for both [-2]proPSA (0.77) and especially for PHI (0.88) levels compared with total PSA (0.59) and % freePSA (0.61) levels. None of the patients included in this study, with histological diagnosis of prostate cancer on biopsy, had a PHI level under 40.

Conclusion:
Determining the [-2]proPSA and derived PHI values contributes significantly to accuracy in the process of the differential diagnosis between BPH and prostate cancer. Based on out experience, a PHI cut-off of 40, with a gray area between 30 and 40, is optimal for use in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate cancer, marker, PHI, [-2]proPSA

Received: November 20, 2013; Accepted: January 20, 2014; Published: January 1, 2014 


References

  1. Heijnsdijk EA, der Kinderen A, Wever EM, et al. Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer. Br J Cancer.2009; 101(11): 1833-1838. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Hanuš M, Matoušková M, Dušek L. Prostate carcinoma. current dilemma of urooncology. how to help the needed and not to harm the others. Klinicka Onkologie 2013; 26(3): 170-178. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Ferda J, Hora M, Hes O, et al. Prostate imaging with 3T MRI in patiens with elevated PSA levels. Ces Radiol 2012; 66(1): 9-17.
  4. Ferda J, Kastner J, Ferdova E, et al. Moelcular imaging of the prostatic carcinoma - our experience. Ces Radiol 2012; 66(3): 289-295.
  5. Ferda J, Kastner J, Hora M, et al. A role of multifactorial evaluation of prostatic 3T MRI in patients with elevated prostatic-specific antigen levels: Prospective comparison with ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy. Anticancer Res 2013; 33(6): 2791-2795.
  6. Roehl KA, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ. Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 2002; 167(6): 2435-2439. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Serefoglu EC, Altinova S, Ugras NS, et al. How reliable is 12-core prostate biopsy procedure in the detection of prostate cancer? Journal of the Canadian Urological Association 2013; 7(5-6): E293-E298. Go to original source...
  8. Dema A, Taban S, Lazar E, et al. Pseudobenign prostate carcinomas: Causes of false-negative biopsy results. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2011; 52(3 Suppl): 963-974.
  9. Houlgatte A, Vincendeau S, Desfemmes F, et al. Use of [-2] pro PSA and phi index for early detection of prostate cancer: A prospective of 452 patients. Prog Urol 2012; 22(5): 279-283. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Lazzeri M, Haese A, de la Taille A, et al. Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: A multicentric european study. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 986-994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit