Ces Urol 2024, 28(4):228-233 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2024033

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in modified supine position

Hana Dittrichová, Pavel Hanek
Urologické oddělení, Oblastní nemocnice Příbram, a. s.

Dittrichová H, Hanek P. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in modified supine position.

Aim: To present our department's experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a modified supine position.

Materials and Methods: During the observed period from January 1, 2020, to May 31, 2023, 93 percutaneous nephrolithotomies were performed in a modified supine position on 80 patients. A retrospective data analysis was conducted. The factors studied included stone size, Guy's stone score, operative time, stone-free rate, complications, fluoroscopy time, use of lithotripsy, and the need for blood transfusion after the procedure.

Result: The average size of the treated stone was 261 mm2. In 31 cases, we dealt with multiple stones, partially cast stones (Guy's stone score 3) in 17 cases, and completely cast stones in 4 cases (Guy's stone score 4). The stone-free rate in our cohort was 78%. Lithotripsy of the stone was necessary in 59 cases (63%). Complications of grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were recorded in 2 cases (2%), grade IIIa in 1 case (1%), and grade IIIb in 8 cases (9%). The average operative time was 44 minutes, and the average fluoroscopy time was 2 minutes and 33 seconds. Blood transfusion after the procedure was required in 2 cases (2%).

Conclusion: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a modified supine position is a safe and effective method for treating nephrolithiasis, with the advantage of reduced operative time due to the stationary position of the patient during the procedure.

Keywords: Modified supine position, nephrolithiasis, percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Received: November 4, 2024; Revised: December 4, 2024; Accepted: December 5, 2024; Published: December 18, 2024 


References

  1. Skolarikos A, Jung H, Neisius A, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Online. EAU guidelines on Urolithiasis. 2024. Dostupné z: https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full-guideline/EAU-Guidelines-on-Urolithiasis-2024.pdf.
  2. Karaolides T, Moraitis K, Bach C, et al. Positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Thirty-five years of evolution. Arab Journal of Urology. 2012; 10(3): 307-316. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012. 06. 005 Go to original source...
  3. Atkinson CJ, Turney BW, Noble JG, et al. Supine vs prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an anaeshetist's view. Online. BJU International. 2011; 108(3): 306-308. ISSN 1464-4096. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10488.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Proietti S, Rodríguez-Socarrás ME, Eisner B, et al. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: tips and tricks. Online. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2019; 8(S4): S381-S388. ISSN 22234683. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019. 07. 09. Go to original source...
  5. Hopper KD, Sherman JL, Luethke GN. The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Online. Radiology. 1987; 162(2): 443-446. ISSN 0033-8419. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.162. 2. 3797658. Go to original source...
  6. Mak DKC, Smith Y, Buchholz N, Noor a El-Husseiny, Tamer. What is better in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - Prone or supine? A systematic review. Online. Arab Journal of Urology. 2019; 14(2): 101-107. ISSN 2090-598X. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016. 01. 005. Go to original source...
  7. Liangren L, Zheng S, Xu Y, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Patients in the Supine Versus Prone Position. Online. Journal of Endourology. 2010; 24(12): 1941-1946. ISSN 0892-7790. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0292. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit